AP Statistics / Mr. Hansen
5/18/1999
TI-83 STAT TESTS Summary
ID |
Common name |
Assumptions |
Comments |
1: |
1-sample z test for mean (or for mean difference of matched pairs) |
SRS from normal population, known s . |
CLT lets us relax normality assumptions for larger samples (see p.510 of textbook). |
2: |
1-sample t test for mean (or for mean difference of matched pairs) |
SRS from normal population, unknown s . |
CLT lets us relax normality assumptions for larger samples (see p.510 of textbook). |
3: |
2-sample z test for mean |
2 independent SRS’s, rest same as for #1. |
Rarely used. |
4: |
2-sample t test for mean |
2 independent SRS’s from normal population (can relax the normality assumption for larger samples), unknown s 1 and s 2. |
Can use n1+n2 instead of n to achieve the 15- or 40-item criteria on p.510. Also note that this test is especially robust when n1 and n2 are approx. equal. Use pooled ("equal variances") procedure only if s 1 = s 2 can be assumed. |
5: |
1-proportion z test |
SRS from "large" population (at least 10n), np³ 10, n(1–p)³ 10. |
Need large population so that SRS resembles sampling with replacement (i.e., "independent" trials to justify binomial model); other 2 assumptions ensure that z approximation to the binomial is reasonable. (We’re actually making 2 approximations.) |
6: |
2-proportion z test |
2 independent SRS’s from "large" populations (at least 10n1 and 10n2), |
Same comments as for #5. Note that in the usual case (H0: p1=p2), standard practice is to use p=(x1+x2)/(n1+n2), the pooled estimate of sample proportion, in the "equal variances" standard deviation formula, which is shown on your AP formula sheet as Ö (p(1–p)) Ö (1/n1 + 1/n2). |
7: |
1-sample z conf. int. for m (or for mean difference of matched pairs) |
Same as #1. |
|
8: |
1-sample t conf. int. for m (or for mean difference of matched pairs) |
Same as #2. |
|
9: |
2-sample z conf. int. for difference of means (m 1 – m 2) |
Same as #3. |
Rarely used. |
0: |
2-sample t conf. int. for difference of means (m 1 – m 2) |
Same as #4. |
|
A: |
1-proportion z conf. int. for p |
Same as #5. |
|
B: |
2-proportion z conf. int. for p1 – p2 |
Same as #6, except do not use pooled estimate for p. |
We avoid pooled estimate for p since we are not hypothesizing that p1=p2. |
C: |
c 2 test for homogeneity of proportions, or for independence |
All cells are counts from SRS, all expected counts ³ 1, avg. expected count ³ 5. For 2 ´ 2 tables, all expected counts ³ 5. |
Use df = (rows–1)(cols–1). Expected counts need not be integers. TI-83 computes each expected count cell using the following formula: |
n/a |
c 2 goodness-of-fit test (the CHISQGOF program that we wrote in class) |
All cells are counts from an SRS with all expected cells ³ 5. |
Use df = (# of cells – 1). Expected counts need not be integers. |
E: |
linear regression t test |
(1) The mean y value for each x value lies on the regression line, (2) variance about regression line does not vary with x, and (3) residuals are normally distributed about the regression line. |
Use df = n – 2, where n denotes the number of data points. |