Lesson Plan for Friday, 2/22/2008
Objectives:
     (1) Learn from mistakes in §10.8 homework.
     (2) Learn what is meant by prorating (not in textbook).
     (3) Learn how to compute arc length of any fractional part of a circle (§10.9).

Introduction
     Greet students
     Demonstrate new Smokey ringtones (now fully connected and operational!)

HW review (§10.8)
     Scan
     Audit
     Honor reminder
     #8a: y cannot be found without considering the unmarked segment length (mark it as x).
            Backward chaining: find x by solving equation 62 = 4(4 + x) by TSPT.
            Help students understand why secant “whole chunk” is 4 + x, not 4x or 8 + x, etc.
            If students cannot find x = 5, spend 5 minutes re-teaching Algebra I.
            Assuming x = 5 is found, write second equation 3(3 + y) = 4(4 + x) by SSPT.
            Solve to get y = 9.
            Enrichment: show students why it was never actually necessary to solve for x.
            (Since 62 = 4(4 + x) by TSPT, we know 4 + x = 9. Therefore, second equation
                 becomes 3(3 + y) = 4(9) = 36 by substituting the value for 4 + x.)
     #8b: Re-teach portion of Chapter 9 where we learned c2 = a2 + b2 iff triangle is right.
            Rule for students to remember: Look at the longest side!
            If c is “too small” (that is, if c2 < a2 + b2), then  (acute).
            If c is “too big” (that is, if c2 > a2 + b2), then  (obtuse).
            From part (a) we know the sides are 6, 12, 13.
            Remind students of the 5, 12, 13 family. Without doing any arithmetic, what

                  do we know about a 6, 12, 13 situation?
            The longest side is 13, which we call c (the “hypotenuse candidate”).
            But look! This c is too small. (Since 132 = 52 + 122, we know 132 < 62 + 122.)
            Answer: acute.
     #9. Let AE = x. Then by CCPT, x(7 – x) = 2 · 3.
            Simplify to get x2 – 7x + 6 = 0.
            Factor to get (x – 1)(x – 6) = 0.
            Since either x – 1 = 0 or x – 6 = 0, x = 1 or x = 6.
            Even if they grumble, force the students to check both answers.
            If x = 1, then BE = 6, so that CCPT gives 1 · 6 = 3 · 2 (OK).
            If x = 6, then BE = 1, so that CCPT gives 6 · 1 = 3 · 2 (OK).
            Enrichment: Does the location of the circle prove anything?
            (If the location of the center is meaningful, then we must reject x = 1.
                 However, the dot is provided simply to show that we have a circle,
                 not to indicate relative placement of the center.)
     #10. Chastise any student who wrote PQ = 1 by inspection.
            Answer is 1, but students must be able to write equation: 32 = PQ(PQ + 8).
            If they need to let PQ = x, that is OK.
            Equation is quadratic and produces solutions PQ = 1 or PQ = –9 (reject).
            If some students can’t solve the quadratic to get PQ = 1 or PQ = –9, spend a
                 chunk of time re-teaching Algebra I. Be pleasant about it, but encourage
                 them to get up to speed. Otherwise, Algebra II will be a miserable time.
     #11. Make sure every student can write equation 6(10) = x(x + 7).
            Explain that on next Tuesday’s test, equation by itself is worth half credit.
            Simplify to get x2 + 7x – 60 = 0, solve to get x = 5 or x = –12.
            For students who can’t factor, reassure them that quadratic formula (with
                 correct plug-ins) is usually going to get them full credit, even if they
                 can’t do the arithmetic. Exception would be if simplification is required.
            Since x is a length, reject negative root to get x = 5.
            Check: 5 · 12 = 6 · 10 as needed (OK).
     #13. Let d = diameter = AB.
            Then by TSPT, 62 = 4(4 + d). Tell students that this alone is worth half credit.
            There is no need to show the work of solving this equation (same as #8a).
            Since d = 5, r = 2.5.
     #15. Make sure everyone can at least understand why (HE)2 = 100(8100).
            Chastise any student who needs a calculator to solve this.
            
     #16. By CCPT, (x – 2)(x + 7) = 4(2x – 1).
            Simplify to get x2 – 3x – 10 = 0.
            Solve to get x = –2 or x = 5.
            Chastise any student who rejects x = –2 without explaining why.
            Since x is not a length, we cannot automatically reject a negative answer!
            But since one of the lengths is x – 2, x = –2 is unacceptable.
            Check: If x = 5, then CCPT gives 3 · 12 = 9 · 4 (OK).
     #17. This problem is hard based on what we know at this point.
            Solve by assuming EF = 4 and BC = 3. (Warning: These need to be proved.)
            By CCPT with small circle, 3x = 2y. Solve for y to get y = 1.5x (useful later).
            By CCPT with large circle, 7(x + 4) = 5(y + 3).
            Substitute from above to get 7(x + 4) = 5(1.5x + 3).
                 7x + 28 = 7.5x + 15
                 13 = 0.5x
                 26 = x = DE (answer 1)
                 39 = 1.5x = y = DC (answer 2)
            Tell students to give themselves half a gold star for getting this far.
            To earn a full gold star, and a couple of extra credit points, they must prove
                 a little lemma.
            Lemma: Whenever two concentric circles are cut by a common secant line,
                 the two segments within the larger circle but external to the smaller
                 circle (i.e.,the two segments that surround the chord of the smaller circle)
                 must be congruent.
            Take 5-6 minutes of class time to prove this if students seem interested.
            The proof is not hard but requires splitting into two cases.
            Case I (secant passing through common center) is easy.
            Case II (secant not passing through common center) is somewhat harder.
                 Offer hint of using Thm. 74 (radius  chord) twice.

     Stretch break

     Turn to p. 499 (§10.9)
     Ask students if they know what the word prorate means.


     Example: If 21 out of 25 students (84%) agree to go on a trip to New Orleans that
          everyone was originally supposed to go on, and a donor to the school had agreed
          to contribute $8,000 to subsidize the trip, how much should each student receive
          to defray travel expenses?
     (Let students think for a while, then use Smokey to choose someone to answer.)
     Answer: The $8,000 should be prorated since fewer students are traveling. Originally
          everyone’s share would have been $320. By prorating this at a factor of 21/25
          (or if you prefer, 84%), we get $268.80.

     Today’s vocabulary word: prorating means multiplying by a suitable factor.

     Example #2: Mr. Hansen buys a can of asparagus, a pack of chewing gum, and
          a squirt gun for a total of $5.42 plus sales tax of 21 cents. Because the squirt gun
          is for educational purposes, the supermarket agrees to provide a prorated sales
          tax exemption, even though food items and non-food items have different sales
          tax rates. (This is sometimes done if the amounts are small or if the difficulty of
          reconstructing the itemized subtotals makes prorating a more sensible option.)
          How much money does Mr. Hansen get back if the retail price of the squirt gun
          is $2.95?
     Answer: Since the squirt gun represents 2.95/5.42 of the total retail price, the suitable
          prorating factor is 2.95/5.42, or about 54%. Mr. Hansen gets a whopping 11 cents
          as a refund. (Multiply 21 cents times the prorating factor, and round to the
          nearest penny.)

     Example #3: Joe Schmo and his wife, Flo, earn a total of $72,350 in calendar year
          2007. When filing their state income tax form, they are asked to allocate their
          married-couple exemption of $2,600 according to income. If Joe earned $31,000
          and Flo earned $41,350, how should the exemption be split between them?
     Answer: Joe’s share of the income is 31000/72350, giving a prorating factor of about
          42.85%. Flo’s share of the income is 41350/72350, giving a prorating factor of
          about 57.15%. (Tell students to do the division on a calculator to check the
          arithmetic. Show students how Smokey can be used as a calculator if they don’t
          have one.)
               Final answers: Multiply 2600(0.4285) to get $1114 for Joe’s exemption.
               Multiply 2600(0.5715) to get $1486 for Flo’s exemption.
          Note: On income tax forms, amounts are always rounded to the nearest dollar.

     Example #4: Compute the arc length of a 62.9-degree arc in a circle of radius 11 cm.
     Answer: The prorating factor is 62.9/360, because that is the portion of the circle’s
          circumference represented by the arc.
               We know that the total circumference is .
          (Remind students that they can either multiply  times diameter or use .)
          Therefore, multiply  times the prorating factor to get approximately 12.08 cm.
          At this point, someone will always ask if answer can be left unsimplified on test.
          Reassure students that they need to simplify only if the problem demands it.
          However, simplification is always required in HW, since presumably there are
               calculators available at home.

     Ask students to look at #5abcd and give each answer in conceptual terms (unsimplified).
     They will be doing these again in more detail for HW.

     Wish them a happy weekend.