AP Statistics / Mr. Hansen |
Name: _______________________________________ |
11/10/2006 |
|
Quest through p. 276 in text, Version 3
Please read:
Calculator and a handwritten note
sheet are permitted. Point values: 2 pts. each for
“matching” section, 4 points everywhere else. There is no penalty for wrong
guesses (unlike on the AP exam, where each wrong guess costs 125% of the
question’s value). MARK ANSWERS ONLY ON
YOUR BUBBLE SHEET.
1. |
In a linear regression,
your calculator reports r2
= 0.841. Which of the following is a true statement? |
|||
|
(A) Approximately 84% of
the variation in y can be explained
by the variation in x. (B) Approximately 84% of
the variation in log y can be
explained by the variation in x. (C) Approximately 91.7% of
the variation in y can be explained
by the variation in x. (D) Approximately 91.7% of
the variation in log y can be
explained by the variation in x. (E) Approximately 70.7% of
the variation in y can be explained
by the variation in x. |
|||
|
|
|||
2. |
We store our x values in L1 and our y values in L2. We then
compute a LSRL with STAT CALC 8 L1,L2,Y1
to obtain r = –0.118. The residual
plot shows no patterns. What happens if we re-run the LSRL, except this time
using the command STAT CALC 8 L2,L1,Y1? |
|||
|
(A) r = –0.118, showing weak negative linear association between the
variables (B) r = 0.118, showing weak positive linear association (since x and y were switched) (C) r = –0.118, showing strong negative linear association between
the variables (D) r = 0.118, showing strong positive linear association (since x and y were switched) (E) [insufficient
information to answer] |
|||
|
|
|||
3. |
A scatterplot
shows an almost perfect linear relationship between x and y. The r2 value is close to 1, and
the residual plot shows no patterns. Can we infer that a change in y causes a change in x? |
|||
|
(A) No, since it is more likely
(statistically speaking) that a change in x
causes a change in y. (C) No, unless y represents the control group in a
controlled experiment. (D) No, since both x and y could be affected by a lurking variable. |
|||
|
|
|||
4. |
Radio call-in shows, as a
means of gauging public opinion in D.C., suffer primarily from . . . |
|||
|
(A) response bias (B) voluntary response bias (C) undercoverage, since few people have |
(D) placebo
effect (E) overcoverage, since people with multiple radios in their
house will hear the broadcast more than once |
||
|
|
|||
5. |
What sort of person would
you hire to design a push poll? |
|||
|
(A) “spin doctor” (p.r. expert/political
consultant) (B) moron |
(D) applied mathematician |
||
|
|
|||
6. |
What topic has Mr. Hansen
stressed more than any other? |
|||
|
(A) bias |
(D) P value |
||
|
|
|||
7. |
In order to prove cause and
effect by means of statistics, we need a number of ingredients. Which of the
following ingredients is not
required, however? |
|||
|
(A) controlled experiment |
(D) methodology (E) statistically
significant results supporting the hypothesis |
||
|
|
|||
8. |
In the Nov. 7 “Quick Study”
column, one of the studies involved stroke victims and alternative therapies
to help them improve the use of their affected hand. Give a possible source
of bias for this study. |
|||
|
(A) no control group |
(D) treatments were not
assigned randomly |
||
|
|
|||
9. |
In the Nov. 7 “Quick Study”
column, one of the studies looked at possible associations between diet and
cognitive decline in older people. What were the conclusions? |
|||
|
(A) No association between diet and rate of cognitive decline was
found. (B) Vegetable consumption and fruit consumption both cause a
reduction in cognitive decline rate. (C) Vegetable consumption, but not fruit consumption, causes a
reduction in cognitive decline rate. (D) Vegetable
and fruit consumption are both associated with a reduction in cognitive
decline rate. (E) Vegetable
consumption, but not fruit consumption, is associated with a reduction in
cognitive decline rate. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
In questions 10 through 12,
suppose that “Chris,” a medical researcher, wishes to find publishable cause-and-effect
relationships in order to impress a tenure review committee. Chris decides to
perform 450 experiments all at once, using highly efficient microassay technology in a controlled experimental
setting. (This is actually possible nowadays.) Chris’s plan is to publish and
claim that cause and effect was proved statistically for each of the
experiments in which the P value is
less than 0.05. Recall that the P
value, which is computed either by software or by calculator, is the
probability that differences of a certain size (or greater) would occur,
given that chance alone was the only force at work. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
To put this in plain
English, Chris will publish and claim a cause and effect relationship for each
experiment in which chance alone would cause such a striking outcome only
about 1 time in 20. |
|||
|
|
|||
10. |
If chance alone were the
only force at work, approximately how many of Chris’s
450 experiments will be “publishable” under this rather twisted concept of publishability? (Remember, Chris intends to publish each
result where the P value is less
than 0.05.) |
|||
|
(A) 0 |
(D) 20 |
||
|
|
|||
11. |
Why is Chris’s concept of publishability unacceptable? |
|||
|
(A) Chris’s laboratory provides no opportunity for a controlled
experimental setting. (B) Microassay technology is too new to be used in
experiments. (C) Since the
hypotheses were not made before the
experiments were run, the results are bogus. Chance alone can explain the
fact that some of the experiments were successful. Unless Chris can predict which of the 450 experiments
will show statistically significant results, there is nothing publishable
here. Chris’s process is like a “witch hunt” for cause and effect. (D) Cause and effect cannot be proved statistically. (E) All of the above. |
|||
|
|
|||
12. |
Why is the legendary story of
the “called shot” by Babe Ruth (famous U.S. baseball player, 1895-1948)
relevant to our study of statistics? |
|||
|
(A) Home runs
occur nearly every day during the season, but a called shot would be an amazing
thing indeed. No ordinary hitter could ever hope to point to a place in the
bleachers and then hit a home run to that place. Chance alone could not
plausibly explain such an occurrence. (B) Baseball
fans are obsessed with statistics, perhaps more so than fans of any other
sport. (C) The
Curtiss Candy Company claimed that the Baby Ruth bar was not named for Babe
Ruth. (D) The called
shot allegedly occurred in the 1932 World Series at Chicago’s Wrigley Field,
not far from where a certain statistics teacher used to visit on occasion in
the 1980s. (E) The story
is interesting but completely irrelevant. |
|||
|
|
|||
13. |
Although this type of bias
can be involved in a variety of studies, it is an especially difficult
challenge for surveys involving sensitive topics (e.g., drug use). |
|||
|
(A) voluntary response bias |
(D) bias caused by placebo
effect |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Matching I.
On your bubble sheet, mark the letter of the entry from the right column that
best matches the numbered entry on the left. Each choice is used exactly
once. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
___ 14. r |
(A) response value
(predicted by model) |
||
|
___ 15. r2 |
(B) response value (actual
data) |
||
|
___ 16. b |
(C) coefficient of
determination |
||
|
___ 17. y |
(D) true value of slope
parameter in LSRL model of form a +
bx |
||
|
___ 18. |
(E) linear correlation
coefficient |
||
|
|
|
||
|
Matching II.
Same rules as above. Note that no entries are shared between lists. That is,
questions 14-18 use choices A through E above, and questions 19-22 use
choices A through D below. |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
___ 19. s |
(A) sample standard
deviation |
||