Monthly Schedule

(AP Statistics, Period B)

T 2/1/05

Review (continued), including metaknowledge quiz. The test originally scheduled for today has been moved to Wednesday.

Please have all recent HW prepared and ready. If you have missed class, you are responsible for obtaining thorough notes and problem writeups from another student.

Answers to the Stan Stanford questions are now available. I had computer troubles, and I apologize for the delay in posting these.

 

W 2/2/05

HW due: In addition to studying for your test, you should begin reading the assignment due Thursday.

Groundhog Day Test on Chapters 5 and 8. Because Chapter 5 has not been sufficiently well tested, there will be a few questions on blocking, stratification, randomization, bias, experimental design, simulation, and related concepts. Everyone must take this test.

 

Th 2/3/05

HW due: Read pp. 239-245 of the Barron’s book, and write a definition (in your own words) of the term sampling distribution. There is a huge amount of “meat” to this reading, and you should set aside a minimum of one hour to let it all sink in. Take careful reading notes. The first paragraph on p. 239, all by itself, is worth careful study.

In class: Unfortunately, because I have lost my voice, you will be on your own after attendance is taken. Here is what you are to do during class:

 

1.         On the subject of Kookoo Kola (from Tuesday’s metaknowledge quiz), here is the lowdown on the marketing fiasco that was New Coke. Thanks to the student who provided this link! Please read the article and write out one or two sentences to answer this question: What is the connection between Chapter 5 in your textbook and the market research described in the article?

2.         On yesterday’s test, nobody did what I would call an excellent job on the experimental design question. I would like you to revisit the question, using whatever notes and other resources you wish (including other students to bounce ideas against), and write up an improved submission. My criticisms of the original versions were (a) only a few students mentioned the issue of blinding, (b) illegibility was a problem in about half of the writeups, (c) some people addressed only part of the research problem (e.g., men only), (d) most people forgot to indicate clearly where randomization takes place, (e) some people were vague about the control group, referring to it only as a “control group” instead of specifying what that means in this context, and (f) some people forgot to write the research question in the form of a question.

 

By sunset today (5:30 p.m.), please e-mail me your answers to #1 and #2, plus the definition of sampling distribution that was due today. If you use a diagram in #2 (recommended) and cannot figure out how to e-mail the diagram, then send the text by e-mail and give the diagram to me tomorrow. You should have at least a couple of sentences of text for each question, even if you plan to use a diagram in #2.

Note: E-mail is required for questions 1 and 2 and the definition of sampling distribution. I guess that should solve the legibility problem!

For your reference, here is the original test question:

 

2. I hypothesize that a certain medication promotes a reduction of hair loss in humans. Men are known to have a much greater hair loss problem, on average, than women. Pose a research question and design an experiment to address it.

 

F 2/4/05

Optional Re-take of Chapter 5 & 8 Test, 7:00 a.m., Room S. If you choose to take this test, the better of the two scores will be counted.

HW due: Main text #9.9 through 9.16 (all except for #9.14). Also, there was apparently a misunderstanding at the start of yesterday’s class—I guess not everyone got the word that you were supposed to work on a Web-based assignment, not just take a free period. Accordingly, I will accept yesterday’s in-class exercise (the three things that were supposed to be e-mailed to me by sunset) without penalty if you send it in e-mail format before the start of class today.

 

M 2/7/05

No additional HW due. I will accept the HW that was due Friday with a minor penalty. The in-class work from Thursday will be accepted with a larger penalty.

The HW due Friday is a fairly long (though straightforward) problem set and will count as a double scan. Also, I will be re-scanning problems 6-9 from the “Stan Stanford” set, originally due 1/31/2005. My answers have already been posted, but of course your answers will be different.

If you take a cut today, you will need to make up the HW scans. Normally, you would have to do that before class. However, I will accept make-up scans that occur during Math Lab today.

 

T 2/8/05

Quiz (10 pts.) on Sampling Distributions and CLT. This will be a real quiz, not an experimental quiz. However, if you paid attention Friday and Monday, you should have no trouble.

 

W 2/9/05

HW due: #9.20, 9.21. You may need to reread some of the previously assigned Barron’s book pages (239-241) before beginning. The “rules of thumb” mentioned in the problems are found on pp. 506-507 of the main text. The first rule of thumb is one that we have already discussed, namely that the population must be “large” relative to the sample in order to ensure approximately independent trials. The second rule of thumb can be summarized as np ³ 10, nq ³ 10.

The HW due Friday may also be rescanned. This time everyone should have the guinea pig simulation (#9.9) complete, and there should be no gaps remaining in the other problems.

 

Th 2/10/05

HW due: #9.41, 9.46. Also make sure that you have shown your work for the previously assigned problems, since some of them may be rescanned.

 

F 2/11/05

HW due: Read footnotes 1 and 7 on p. 530 of the main text; write #9.45, 9.47, 9.49, 9.50, 9.53.

 

M 2/14/05

No additional HW due. Enjoy your weekend. However, make sure your HW for the second semester is complete, and begin studying for your test.

In class: Review of sampling distributions.

 

T 2/15/05

Test on Sampling Distributions and Recent Discussions. The material tested will align closely with Chapter 9 in the main text. There will be no re-take opportunity for this test.

 

W 2/16/05

No additional HW due today.

 

Th 2/17/05

HW due: Read pp. 272-273 (in the Barron’s book) very carefully.

 

F 2/18/05

No school.

 

M 2/21/05

No school.

 

T 2/22/05

Attendance is required for everyone, as usual. The optional Tuesday-Thursday attendance that was scheduled to begin today has been suspended until further notice. We will see if it can be implemented later in the semester.

HW due: #11.27, 11.28ab, 11.30a. Although you must show your work, you are free to use your calculator and the CINT (confidence interval converter) program to check your answers.

 

W 2/23/05

HW due: Read pp. 265-269 (and the first 2 sentences at the top of p. 270) in the Barron’s book; write #12.13, 12.16, 12.14 in the main text. Hint: For #12.14, compute a C.I. for the true proportion of patients who would suffer adverse symptoms, and use that C.I. as a tool to address the question posed.

 

Th 2/24/05

No school (snow).

 

F 2/25/05

HW due: Make sure, if you have not already done so, that each of your C.I. answers due this week includes a conclusion written using the “approved wording style” given in class. Then read p. 293 through the middle of p. 296 in the Barron’s book, and write #12.36b and #12.42 in the main text.

In class: Quiz (10 points) on the reading assignment. If you wish, you may use notes written in your own handwriting. This quiz is designed to see if you are noticing and retaining the key points from the reading. There will be no computation, and a calculator will not be permitted.

 

M 2/28/05

No school (snow).

 

 


Return to the Statistics Zone

Return to Mr. Hansen’s home page

Return to Mathematics Department home page

Return to St. Albans home page

Last updated: 02 Mar 2005