| 1. | differential, integral, Fundamental Theorem
  of Calculus, FTC | 
 
  |   |   | 
 
  | 2. | limit, Riemann, 0 | 
 
  |   |   | 
 
  | 3. | rectangle, right, height, trapezoid (Trapezoidal Rule),
  adaptive quadrature, faster
 Adaptive quadrature uses a small mesh size only in
  places where the function is changing most rapidly, i.e., where the small
  mesh size provides the greatest benefit. In regions where the function is not
  changing rapidly, wide rectangles (or trapezoids, or whatever) can be used to
  achieve acceptable accuracy while saving time. Although Riemann sums for integrable functions become more accurate with decreasing
  mesh size, it is a waste of time and processing power to use the smallest
  mesh size everywhere.
 | 
 
  |   |   | 
 
  | 4. | See footnote [1] at modd.net/abbrevs2.htm#FTC for a
  statement of FTC1 and FTC2. | 
 
  |   |   | 
 
  | 5. | See modd.net/23calc/handouts/ftc1and2.htm
  for the proofs. Here are the justifications for the chains of equalities:
 FTC1 Ž FTC2:
 First equality is by FTC1 (assumed true by hypothesis).
 Second is by properties of derivatives (deriv.
  of diffs. = diff. of derivs., deriv. of a const. is 0).
 Third is by def. of G
  as an antiderivative of f.
 
 FTC2 Ž FTC1:
 First equality is by a property of definite integrals (splitting
  at an intermediate point).
 Second is by commutative property of addition (switching order of
  addition).
 Third is by another property of definite integrals (switching
  limits causes change of sign).
 Fourth is by def. of the accumulator function, H.
 Fifth is by substitution, since we previously showed that "x, H(x) = G(x) – C.
 Sixth is by algebraic simplification.
 | 
 
  |   |   |   | 
 
  | 6. | 
 |   | 
 
  |   |   |   | 
 
  |   |   |   | 
 
  | 7. | If we let G(x) = ∫x–2.1 f (t)
  dt + C, we will certainly have an antiderivative, since FTC2 guarantees that G′(x) = f (x). However, we must choose C so that G(–2.1) = –3.118. By
  inspection, C must equal –3.118.
  Answer: G(7)
  = ∫7–2.1 f
  (t) dt + C = 2,645,280.660 + (–3.118) = 2,645,277.542. [Note: A TI-83 or TI-83 Plus calculator
  takes roughly twice as long to find the answer if you forget to specify e = .001 as the fifth parameter in MATH 9.] |   | 
 
  |   |   |   | 
 
  | 8. | Note for both methods:
 Total distance traveled = ∫010 |v(t)|
  dt, but since
  we know that rockets are fired upward, we can make the simplifying assumption
  that v(t) ³ 0, thereby eliminating the absolute value bars. (If the problem had
  asked for net distance traveled,
  then it would be correct to eliminate the absolute value bars at the outset.)
 
 Trapezoidal Rule:
 
 ∫010 |v(t)| dt = ∫010
  v(t) dt
  (by the note above; not true in general)
 » ½ Dt (v(0) + 2v(2.5) + 2v(5) + 2v(7.5) + v(10))
 =
  ½ (2.5) (0 + 20 + 50 + 80 + 60)
 =
  ½ (2.5) (210)
 =
  262.5 m
 
 Simpson’s Rule:
 
 ∫010 |v(t)| dt = ∫010
  v(t) dt
  (by the note above; not true in general)
 » 1/3 (Dt) (v(0) +
  4v(2.5) + 2v(5) + 4v(7.5) + v(10))
 =
  1/3 (2.5) (0 + 40 + 50 + 160 + 60)
 =
  1/3 (2.5) (310)
 » 258.333 m
 |   | 
 
 
  |  |  |  |  |