1. _E_
|
Since limit is of form 0/0
(indeterminate), apply L’Hôpital’s Rule.
|
|
|
2. _B_
|
This is a precal review problem. Since f (2) = 8 + 4 = 12, plug in to get g(8) = Ö(12 – 11) = Ö11.
|
|
|
3. _C_
|
This is similar to #2, but students
found it much harder. Since f (1) =
ln 1 = 0, plug in to get g(0) = e3 · 0 = e0
= 1.
|
|
|
4. _E_
|
Yet another precal review problem, this one requires checking whether
(A) y and –y are interchangeable, (B) x
and –x are interchangeable, (C) (x, y)
is on the graph iff (–x, –y) is on the graph,
or (D) (x, y) is on the graph iff (y, x)
is on the graph, i.e., x and y are interchangeable. A quick glance
reveals that none of these conclusions are satisfied.
Or, if you are good with algebra, you can complete the square twice and
perform some manipulations to get the equation
(x – 3)2/25
+ (y + 1)2/16 = 1.
In both Algebra II and Precalculus, you learned
that this is the equation of an ellipse with center at (3, –1), horizontal semi-major
axis of 5, and vertical semi-minor axis of 4. A quick sketch reveals that
none of the symmetries described in (A) through (D) are satisfied.
|
|
|
5. _E_
|
Apply FTC: ò27 x3
dx = x4/4 |27
= 74/4 – 24/4 = 492/4 – 16/4 >> 402/4
– 4 = 1600/4 – 4 = 400 – 4 = 396. Clearly, (E) is the only reasonable choice.
On a “no calculator” portion of the test, the numbers will seldom get this
large, but if they do, you should be prepared to use some estimation
shortcuts as shown above to save time.
Here is a way of getting the exact answer relatively quickly without a
calculator:
ò27 x3
dx = x4/4 |27
= 74/4 – 24/4 = 492/4 – 16/4
=
¼(492 – 42) = ¼(49 + 4)(49 – 4) = ¼(53)(45)
=
¼(53)(40) + ¼(53)(5) = 530 + ¼(265) = 530 + ½(132.5)
=
530 + 66.25 = 596.25
There is also a faster way, if you are clever enough to do get inside the
head of the question writer. You should already know that 73 = 343.
(The number 343 also has significance as the number of FDNY heroes who died on
9/11/01.) Since 73 = 343, you know that choices (C) and (D) are
meant to fool students who thought they could compute the integral as 73,
or as 73 – 23. Choices (A) and (B) are much too small,
since a trapezoid rule estimate of ò67 x3
dx all by
itself would be ½(63 + 73) » ½(200 + 350) » 275. By the time the curve y = x3 has
reached 6 or 7 on the x-axis, the
curve is practically going straight upward, and this estimate of 275 is
surprisingly accurate. (Use your calculator if you doubt this.) Thus (E) is
the only reasonable choice.
|
|
|
|
6. _B_
|
By implicit differentiation
(review if necessary!), we have
6x – [2xy3 + x2(3y2y¢)] + 4y¢ = 0
–3x2y2y¢ + 4y¢ = –6x + 2xy3
y¢(–3x2y2 + 4) = –6x + 2xy3
Divide both sides of this last equation by (–3x2y2
+ 4) to get the answer. Note that the two tricky parts are (1) getting
everything involving y¢ on the LHS of the equation and (2) factoring out y¢. If you can remember these steps, and if you can
accurately take all the derivatives without forgetting the chain rule, then you
can do any problem of this type.
|
|
|
|
|
7. _E_
|
We require that the limit
from the left, namely 3(–1)2 + 2, must equal the limit from the
right, namely –c(–1) + 5. In other words, we require
3 + 2 = c + 5
By inspection, c = 0 is the only value of c that works.
|
|
|
|
8. _D_
|
Let u denote the radicand, i.e., (8 + x2)/(x2
+ x). Since the cube-root function
is continuous, the limit of the cube root of u must equal the cube root of the limit of u. We can find the limit of u
either by inspection or by L’Hôpital’s Rule.
Method 1 (inspection): Since numerator and denominator are both of degree 2
and have the same leading coefficient, lim u = 1.
Method 2 (L’Hôpital’s Rule): Since u is of the indeterminate form ¥/¥, lim u
= lim [2x/(2x + 1)] = lim [2/(2 + 0)] = 1. Note that we actually applied L’Hôpital’s Rule twice here.
Either way, we know that lim u = 1. Taking the cube root of this limit gives a final answer of
1.
|
|
|
|
9. _D_
|
We discussed this a number of times in class. The “V”-shaped graph of f (x)
= |x| has a cusp at the origin but
is linear (hence differentiable) everywhere else.
WARNING: The TI-83 and TI-83 Plus
calculators both return the wrong answer for f ¢(0), because they use the symmetric difference method for estimating
the numeric derivative. They should give an error message, but instead they
will happily tell you that nDeriv(abs(X),X,0) equals 0. The TI-89 does not have this bug.
|
|
|
|
10. _B_
|
By the hint, (1, 4) is on
the graph of f. Therefore, (4, 1)
is on the graph of f –1
(also known as g). Since x and y trade roles in f and g, asking about the instantaneous
slope of g at (4, 1) is astonishly similar to asking about the instantaneous
slope of f at (1, 4).
Since f ¢(x) = 10x4 – 3x2 + 2x, the
instantaneous slope of f at (1, 4)
is found by computing
f ¢(1) = 10(1)4 – 3(1)2 + 2(1) =
10 – 3 + 2 = 9
Is that the final answer? No, because in f
the function is climbing steeply, but at the mirror image point
(4, 1) on the g curve, the
roles of x and y are interchanged. Thus, the rise/run for f would be the run/rise for g.
To find the rise/run for g, we must
take the reciprocal of 9. The final
answer is 1/9.
Your textbook gives a confusing formula on p. 153. (Maybe it makes sense to
you. If so, feel free to use it. However, I have always found it easier and
safer to think through the steps as described above.) This is what the
formula says:
If g = f –1, then g¢(x) = 1/f ¢(y).
(I prefer this version to the extremely confusing version given in your
textbook.) If we apply the formula to our problem, we see that the question
concerns the point (4, 1), i.e., where x
= 4 and y = 1. Therefore, g ¢(4) = 1/f ¢(1) = 1/9. The only other work you would need
to perform is the calculation of f ¢(1) = 9 as shown above.
|
|
|
|
11. _E_
|
Since f ¢(x) = 6x2 – 18x +
12 = 6(x2 – 3x + 2) = 6(x – 1)(x – 2), the sign of f ¢ is determined by the factors (x – 1) and (x – 2). A
number-line sketch (remember those from Algebra II and Precalculus?)
reveals that the factors are usually either both positive
or both negative. Only for x
Î (1, 2) do we have one
of each sign, making the product negative.
|
|
|
|
12. _E_
|
Since f (x) = (2 – x)½,
we have f ¢(x) = –½ (2
– x)–½. For values
slightly smaller than 2, we have
–½(very small positive number) –½ = –½/(square
root of very small positive number) = –½ · (huge positive number).
|
|
|
|
|