AP Statistics / Mr. Hansen |
Name: ______________________ |
Mini-Project
(in 2002-03 and 2017-18, do #3 through #6 only)
1. |
List the two statistics (both name and symbol) whose sampling
distributions we will learn the most about in this class. |
2. |
Remember the claim that was made in the article we read yesterday. The
author claimed that an error rate of 0.05% would produce a 3000-vote error in
6 million votes. Is this true? Design a simulation to test this assertion. |
3. |
Let S = the event that a randomly selected school day in
Washington, D.C., is sunny, let U = the event that a randomly selected
school-day resident of Washington, D.C., is an Upper School student at STA,
and let G be the probability that the randomly selected school-day
resident of Washington, D.C., is wearing galoshes on the randomly selected
school day. Estimate each of the following probabilities (we will compare
answers for a, b, and c before proceeding): |
4. |
Let H = the event of drawing a heart, A = the event of
drawing an ace, K = the event of drawing a king, and R = the
event of drawing a red card. In each case a single draw is performed
from a well-shuffled standard deck of cards. Compute the following, showing
your work or justification for each one: |
A pair of factoids appeared in an issue of Time, Dec. 4, 2000,
p.29: Of all adult Americans, 20% have one or more diagnosable psychological
conditions (anxiety, substance abuse, bipolar disorder, etc.), and of all
cigarette-smoking adult Americans, 44% have diagnosable psychological
conditions. [I have altered the wording slightly in order to make the problem
more amenable to our statistical analysis.] |
|
6. |
Explain in your own words (no copying from collaborators) why a “scattershot” screening approach to medical diagnosis among individuals with no symptoms or risk factors can be inappropriate even if the tests that the doctor is using are extremely accurate. For example, tests for HIV-AIDS antibodies are typically 99% (or more) accurate in detecting viral infection in infected individuals, as well as being 99% (or more) accurate in producing a negative result in non-infected individuals, yet the PPV (positive predictive value, i.e., the conditional probability of infection given a positive reading) of an HIV-AIDS screening test may be below 50%. Why is the PPV so low, even when the tests are so accurate? |